Critical Digital Literacy Education Guide

activity 10: NEWS MEDIA ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (CONTINUED) Use this tool to support Activity 10: News Media Analysis on page 9 of Historica Canada’s Critical Digital Literacy Education Guide . Integrity of Author or Journalist UNRELIABLE RELIABLE 1. Author or journalist is named (not a pseudonym)*. 2. Author or journalist has verifiable credentials (journalism education or education related to their beat, a history of writing reliable articles that is available online, awards, etc.). 3. Even the best writers and journalists will have biases. If the author/journalist has an online presence (e.g. on Twitter), they demonstrate thoughtfulness and express informed opinions. 4. Author or journalist isn’t associated with unreliable or questionable organizations, special interest groups, etc. 5. If the author/journalist has made mistakes in the past, they addressed and apologized for those mistakes. 1. Author or journalist is anonymous, or the name appears to be a pseudonym or fake identity. 2. Author or journalist has no verifiable credentials (journalism education or education related to their beat, online presence that suggests a history of writing reliable articles, etc.). 3. Author or journalist’s writing or online presence suggests a strong political agenda, expressing opinions or framing stories with loaded language, sensationalism, and emotional appeals. 4. Author or journalist is associated with or funded by partisan organizations, special interest groups, etc. 5. Author/journalist has spread misinformation or disinformation in the past, or has misrepresented facts, opinions, or quotes in the past without addressing these errors. *Note: Newspapers, for example, will publish editorials that are attributed to the newspaper’s editorial team, not an individual author. In this case, the claims and opinions expressed are attributed to the names listed on the newspaper’s editorial masthead, which can be found in “About” sections. In the case of wire stories, bylines sometimes credit just the name of a reputable wire service such as the Canadian Press or Reuters, which is also acceptable. Integrity of source UNRELIABLE RELIABLE 1. Clearly stated standards for journalistic integrity (values listed, existence of public editor or similar position, corrections and updates are addressed, etc.). 2. A history, legacy, and/or reputation of quality, reliable journalism (e.g. awards, public record status, etc.). 3. Structure of source can be traced or easily googled, and is not owned or primarily funded by special interest groups. 1. Source publishes clickbait, sensationalism, fearmongering content, propaganda, misinformation, and/or disinformation. 2. Limited or no external information available about the source’s history or reputation. No “About” section, or “About” section uses loaded or sensationalist language. 3. Corporate structure of source is hidden or source is owned/funded by special interest groups. “About” section, if there is one, implies questionable political or financial agenda.