Critical Digital Literacy Education Guide

5 activity 4: THE LAST BEST WEST — THE IMPACT OF DISINFORMATION Examine the motivations of stakeholders in the creation and spread of disinformation, as well as the short-term and long-term effects of disinformation. 1. In small groups, discuss the motivations behind disinformation. Why would governments, special interest groups, or individuals choose to spread disinformation? What are the advantages of disinformation as a tool of socio-political influence? 2. Watch “ The Last Best West ” video as a class or review your notes from Activity 2. 3. Identify individuals and/or groups who benefited from the Canadian government’s campaign of disinformation against Black immigration. Brainstorm other perspectives that should be considered, even if they were not mentioned. These perspectives can include individuals, organizations, and institutions that were involved in shaping immigration to Canada’s West or that were affected by immigration policy in Canada. 4. Consider and discuss the short-term and long-term impacts of the government’s efforts. Which individuals or groups were affected by this historical example of disinformation? Consider more obvious effects as well as subtler changes in social and political attitudes brought about by this disinformation campaign. • What disinformation did anti-immigration agents spread? • Where and when was disinformation spread? • Who was impacted by the disinformation spread in Oklahoma? • Why was disinformation about immigration to Canada spread? MODIFICATION: Complete a 5Ws chart for “ The Last Best West ” video. TEACHER TIP: Use “ The Last Best West ” video as an example or select a current issue in the news. Petition signed by residents of Edmonton and Strathcona urging the Canadian government to prevent further Black immigration, 1911 (Courtesy Library and Archives Canada/R1206-127-4-E). “Canada West: The Last Best West.” Cover of pamphlet produced by the Department of the Interior in 1909 (Courtesy Library and Archives Canada/C-030620). Once we have an understanding of the system behind digital media and “fake news,” we need to critically assess the channels through which we access content and the bias that is built into these channels. Channels influence the content we see, how it reaches us, and how it is presented. We have access to more information than ever, but we aren’t necessarily exposed to a more diverse range of perspectives. Rather, the media and news we are exposed to online are often fragmented and lacking in depth, and may reinforce our existing worldview. In this section, we’ll explore how and why this happens. What are channels? Channels are the sources and pathways through which information flows. This includes social media platforms, radio, television, newspapers, and news websites. Media bias and personalization As people increasingly access news through social media platforms, we must examine how those channels can shape and intensify our biases. We often rely on sources that confirm our existing worldviews. Algorithms on platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube track our online activity to deliver personalized content recommendations. These mechanisms can shape the diversity of perspectives we encounter. section 2: assess channels and bias G.W. Miller writing an editorial (Still from “The Last Best West,” Historica Canada, 2019). Radio studio (Branislav Nenin/ Shutterstock.com/1111185239). Man sitting in front of a laptop (amenic181/Shutterstock.com /1492825922).